Cons — Results may vary.

Executive Summary

The JitterBug FMJ (“Full Metal Jacket”) is a small USB-noise filter. It is the better shielded version of the original 2016 device and improves sound quality in most (but not all) situations.

Introduction

Do you know which class of insects the jitterbug belongs to? No? Well, none at all as the jitterbug is a generic term to describe swing dancing, as featured in the 1939 movie “The Wizard of Oz“.

In USB-Audio, “jitter” refers to time delays in the signal that causes packet errors, which degrade sound quality. Solution is that the DAC reclocks the incoming USB signal...to eliminate these time delays.

Unfortunately, the JitterBug FMJ (and its predecessor JitterBug) does NOT reclock (and therefore not remove jitter) as it is a merely passive device that does not draw electric current (it does not remove bugs either). JitterBug designer Gordon Rankin was a consultant to AudioQuest and did not name the device. This name choice has caused a lot of discussions in the past.

I purchased the original JitterBug upon its release in 2016 together with the DragonFly Black 1.5. At the time, I ran the original Schiit Fulla with my MacBook Air – the JitterBug lowered the noise floor and improved the sonic image.

USB Noise

So what is behind the JitterBug idea? It is noise filtering. Goal is to preserve the signal (and therefore sound quality) along the lines.

Noise in computer’s VBUS and data line causes sound deterioration. Three kinds of noise exist, “Electromagentic Interference” (EMI), “Radio-Frequency Interference” (RFI), and switching noise which is usually high frequency (500Khz -> 2Ghz). They may contribute considerable pollution on the signal path and may increase jitter and packet errors. Running both lines through a single USB cable can cause additional interference and exacerbate the issue (so it is best to separate the two).

If the data line is not effectively shielded, nearby electrical components (e.g. switching power supplies, other fluctuating electrical/magnetic fields from computer circuitry) can contribute to EMI that might pollute the USB data.

AC noise is typically audible as added brightness to the music, glare that rides on the sound. The image lacks body and appears somewhat flat. This noise needs to be filtered out. Jitter causes distortion and packet errors that, in the worst case, may be audible as chopped up sound, like a tonearm jumping on the vinyl record.

Many dacs can be powered by the connected computer, but some also have a dedicated power input. This separation of power line and data line eliminates possible interference inside the USB cable now assigned to data flow only.

The remaining data noise is either little relevant and/or can be more easily filtered out, for example with an AudioQuest JitterBug FMJ or the iFi Nano iUSB3.0.

But, for the JitterBug FMJ to make an audible difference requires a “clean” power supply. A “dirty” power source would possibly mask the JitterBug’s positive effects on the data line.

If the dac is powered by the computer such as an AudioQuest DragonFly Cobalt or Red, the JitterBug FMJ has to tackle both tasks, which is not optimal.

A similar situation arises when the DragonFly/JitterBug FMJ combination is connected to a phone. A phone has a lot more EMI as the components are cramped much tighter into a small enclosure compared to a computer. Turning the WiFi and phone functions off will already likely improve sound quality.

The AudioQuest DragonFly Cobalt has JitterBug functionality integrated in its circuit and it was believed that adding an additional JitterBug FMJ would compromise the audio signal. Latest considerations suggest that adding a JitterBug FMJ may actually be beneficial in some combinations. You may want to play with them in all combinations.

What this tells us is that the JitterBug FMJ is not a device that works black and white on the push of a button. It requires some TLC and is therefore not for everyone, favouring the experimentally inclined.

What does the JitterBug FMJ do?

JitterBug designer Gordon Rankin wrote me:

a) It realigns and removes noise from the D+/D- line, so the receiving side sees a much cleaner and more refined data stream.

b) It removes high-frequency noise from the VBUS/GND power supply. Any endpoint, be it a DAC or whatever, already has a low-frequency filter. Those are huge in size, and what really affects a DAC chip’s linearity is high-frequency noise — not low.

c) I put the JitterBug at the host side because I want all that EMI/RFI and other pollution that the computer is spitting out to stay there and not get to the endpoint.

The FMJ furthers (c) into making that work.

Differential noises on a data stream can cause error in reception of fans positive and negative pulses. Reducing or eliminating these by the JitterBug FMJ’s circuitry produces a cleaner differential signal, which in turn avoids catastrophic data-level events that looks like jitter to an analyzer.

What is new in JitterBug FMJ?

The original JitterBug circuitry has not changed but shielding against external noise was added for more efficiency (“Full Metal Jacket”). And AudioQuest added an integrated carbon-loaded USB plug to further protect against external noise. Old and new JitterBug models can be used in combination.

My sonic Impressions

I tested the JitterBug FMJ with dongles (source-operated thumbdrive-sized DAC/amps connected to my iPhone SE,1st gen.), numerous iems, and my MacBook Air, between March and September. The logic behind my setups was the small form factor dongles and JitterBug FMJ – and therefore portability – have in common.

I did not experiment with desktop stacks as there are bulkier, more thorough, and (much) more expensive options that address additional USB issues.

The JitterBug FMJ worked well with most dongles in my testing. It added body/depth and rounded the top end off. The difference is obvious and skeptics should at least acknowledge that the device changes the sound.

The DragonFly Red shows great synergy with the JitterBug FMJ. Without it, the stage is much shallower and the top end is more aggressive. There is less note weight and the sound is leaner. Plugging the FMJ in adds body and depth, and it adds sweetness to the top end so that the sound is less bright. This also reduces the widescreen effect, which is very much outweighed by the benefits.

The JitterBug FMJ also works well with the Earstudio HUD 100, EarMen Eagle, Hidizs S9 Pro, Shanling UA2, and Apogee Groove – and the basic tenor remains the same: reducing brightness and adding body and refinement to the presentation. Without it, the presentation is shallower and edgier.

The FMJ did not do much to the shrillness of the Shanling UA1, which points to this device’s design issue: the glare may be unrelated to noise and may be caused by lack of the device’s digital filtering.

What also did not work for me is getting improvement from a 2nd JitterBug FMJ plugged into the other USB port of my MacBook Air. Maybe, my SSD and the rather modest computer design render a 2nd device superfluous. But I wonder whether it worked if I had an old-fashioned spinning hard drive.

Why does JitterBug FMJ not work for you?

The JitterBug FMJ may not improve sound with a dac/amp with an independent power supply that introduces its own noise. A cleaned-up USB signal competes with the power-supply pollution – which may neutralize the gains.

There may be no benefit when additional interference is introduced from nearby electrical components.

Or the device has such filtering circuitry already built in, such as the ifi Audio Nano BL DAC/amp. And since the Nano can be battery operated, the power is rather a priori.

Or the audio quality is poor to begin with. Or, the JitterBug FMJ works but we do not register the improvement, be it because of our generally poor auditory memory (mine is particularly bad) or out of prejudice.

Experiment for Yourself

The DragonFly Cobalt has some of JitterBug’s filtering technology built in. Until recently, AudioQuest had advised against using both together in series as it could have unpredictable results.

But some users find that JitterBug FMJ and Cobalt used in series creates an improvement in performance.

I tested with my iPhone SE (first gen.), and after endless A/B-ing, if there was a difference, it was insignificant to my ears. And I can report the same for repeating the experiment with my MacBook Air. But there were also no adverse effects. The JitterBug FMJ made a huge difference with the DragonFly Red, in comparison.

Up to you to find out for yourself whether it works with your devices.

Concluding Remarks

JittterBug FMJ removes EMI, RFI, and switching noises – which helps maintain better low level detail because the DAC chip can reproduce information better. It does not remove audio bandwidth noise as that is better left to the DAC.

JitterBug FMJ is not the perfect solution but a handy and affordable one. It does not work black and white on the push of a button as it deals with issues adherent to the specific devices it is paired with.

It is also no miraculous sound enhancer as it does not add to the signal, it just helps minimizing its degradation.

As a net result, it improved sound quality in most of my applications to the point I don’t want to miss it. You can read co-blogger’s KopiOkaya’s take on the JitterBug FMJ here.

I have had lots of fun using and experimenting with JitterBugs since 2016.

Until next time…keep on listening!

Contact us!

Disclaimer

Two JitterBugs FMJ were provided for my testing by AudioQuest – and I thank them for that. You find the product page here.

Our generic standard disclaimer.

Gallery

The post AudioQuest JitterBug FMJ Review – Quiet Riot? appeared first on Audio Reviews.

Of course, there are other solutions, such as USB galvanic isolators (either electrical or optical) and analog devices such as ADUM-chip based isolators but we are not going there… we shall focus on both iSilencer+ and JitterBug FMJ in this discussion. 

DISCLAIMER: I bought both devices AT FULL RETAIL PRICE with my own money. Thus, my verdicts are not affected or influenced by their manufacturers in any way.

Many folks approach this type of accessory with utmost skepticism. There are a few technical forums that have tested these devices with precision audio analysers proving they do nothing, thus labeling them “snake oil”… We are not going to debate that either.

To me, without actual listening, measurements, diagrams, and graphs tell us nothing about sound. Superior technical performance does not equate to musicality.

Both devices do what they advertised… That is to clean up noise and improve sound.

We shall focus mainly on their SONIC PERFORMANCE. 

Equipment used:

• AudioQuest DragonFly Cobalt
• AudioQuest DragonFly Red
• E1DA 9038S G3
• Asus Xonar Essence STU DAC
• Topping E30/L30 stack
• KBEAR BElieve
• Etymotic ER4SR
• TRN MT1 (modded)
• Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon + Foobar2000
• Self-assembled Intel i7/Asus-based desktop PC + Foobar2000
• Redmi Note 9 Pro + UAPP
• Raspberry Pi 4 Model B + Volumio

Both devices are connected at the host end. As Gordon Rankin, designer of JitterBug FMJ, puts it:

“I put the JitterBug at the host side because I want all that EMI/RFI and other BS that the computer is spitting out to stay there and not get to the endpoint.” 

iFi iSilencer+

When I bought the iSilencer+, it was US$10 cheaper than JitterBug FMJ but this has changed since July 2021. Both are priced at US$59.95 now.

iSilencer+ has a plastic housing with a layer of soft rubber-coating. During installation and removal, this housing slides back and forth, which some folks may find annoying.

Compared to JitterBug FMJ, iSilencer+:

• sounds crisp with upper-midrange glare
• more open and airy
• mid-forward but rest of the frequency spectrum are thrown backward
• less bass impact, drab dynamics
• soundstage is one-dimensional
• USB noise reduction not as thorough (just a bit)

AudioQuest JitterBug FMJ

FMJ is the latest JitterBug from AudioQuest. The original had the same circuitry but no shielded enclosure. JitterBug FMJ housing is made of aluminium, feels solid and sturdy. Nothing is loose or wobbly. Size-wise, JitterBug FMJ is thicker and a slightly longer than iSilencer+.

Compared to iSilencer, JitterBug FMJ:

• overall sounds fuller and more 3D
• better dynamics and bass punch
• better depth and instrument separation
• better sense of PRAT
• cleaner, darker background

Out of curiosity and fun, I piggybacked both devices to create the “ultimate USB decrapifier”…

Host > (iSilencer+ / JitterBug FMJ) > Endpoint

Guess what happened? It actually made the sound worse. Everything sounded constricted and bone dry. I also detected slightly lowered volume gain.

So which one do I choose? Well, it depends. Ultimately, it all boils down to synergy. If your equipment is bright and cool-neutral, I suggest you go for JitterBug FMJ. If you own iFi gears, iSilencer+ does improve clarity and make the “iFi sound” less warm (or wooly).

JitterBug FMJ sounds more 3D in comparison, thus instruments and vocals are more distinctive and bodied. iSliencer+ sounds flatter in comparison. Ironically, AudioQuest DragonFly Cobalt matches the iSilencer+ better to me. Both devices filter USB VBUS/GND noise. JitterBug FMJ does it more thoroughly than iSilencer+.

Verdict

Since both devices are priced the same, it depends on availability. To many of us living in Southeast Asia, iFi products are more common and widely available. Those living in North America may find AudioQuest products easier to access.

If I have to rate both devices, I will give iFi iSilencer+ a 7 out of 10 and JitterBug FMJ an 8 out of 10. I prefer the synergy JitterBug FMJ gives to my audio gears.

USB filters are nothing new. Both iFi and AudioQuest have been making them for years. Some may find this kind of accessory unnecessary… To me, these are good to have… They DO affect sound and enhance music enjoyment to some extent. Whether or not you believe in their effects, I will leave it up to you to decide.

Contact us!

You find an INDEX of our most relevant technical articles HERE.

The post iSilencer+ And JitterBug FMJ Review/Comparison – Silence Of The Jitterbug appeared first on Audio Reviews.